Unit 10 DB 1 Video

Click here:> https://animoto.com/play/tNcfS42i5NX0XEP6bsROJQ

Hello Futuring and Innovation Enthusiast.   I am excited to share my truly awesome video highlighting the key components of my socio-technocal plan which highlights my truly imaginary and far fetched vision of a future in which all humans would utilize a new access control device that would incorporate some of the technologies of today such as a user id, single sign on and biometric identifiers but one that also includes a futuristinc design where a computer chip is embedded in a persons arm and this chip is coded to the persons DNA.  With the DNA coding the chip could only be used by them.  The futuring innovation would also include a new form digital certificates that are built on quantum computing and unbreakable.  

Preview:

1. A chip would be coded to a persons DNA,

2. A digital certificate would be created using quantum cryptorgraphy and using the persons DNA code as the key for the cryptographic algorithm seed. 

3. The unique digital certificate would be coded the chip and then inserted into the person.

4. The digital certificate would be placed into a data base on a server that is checked and provides authorization to resources once the user is authenticated.

5. A single sign on token is generated for use for that business day that allows the person access to all of their applications.   

The video resonates with upbeat music and contains 9 photographs that tell the story of the innovation which I call Prydentification. 

1. The topic is access controls

2. There are many different forms of access controls today but none of them are unbreakable

3. In the current state end users need to remember passwords 

4. Remembering passwords can be difficult 

5. End users get frustrated when they cannot remember a password

6. End users will write passwords on sticky notes as a way to remember them but this negates security

7. Biometrics are a good answer to the password problem and many exist today.

8. The future will use a persons DNA for biometric identification

9.The future will have us using an embedded chip that is coded to our DNA and uses advanced encryption to identify us and stay secure. 


PS.  I tried to use the embedded code option but the box came up empty that contained the code to use. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
 Unit 9 IP Socio-Technical Plan Part 2  ( Final Post )            Futuring and Innovation 2   Michael Pry Colorado Technical University CS875 Futuring and Innovation Unit 9 IP Dr. Calongne October 16, 2022                                   Sociotechnical Plan for Implantable Biometric Identification – Part 1 Introduction: In every society, there is a need for its citizens to be able to identify themselves. This is driven by the need for individual accountability for their actions to differentiate the group members from one another and regulate access to resources. In the field of cybersecurity, personal identification falls under the domain of access controls. "Access control is a way of limiting access to a system or physical or virtual resources. In Computing, access control is a process by w...
Read more
 Unit 8 DB 1  The impact of disruptive technology: It was the year 2005, and Eastman Kodak had just celebrated a banner year with $11, 895,000,000. In revenue. Much to its dismay, that would be its best year in recent history. From 2005 to 2012, their revenue declined until it hit its bottom at $812,000,000. Since then, its revenue has remained relatively flat (Statista, 2022).  This is a case study of how good management practices can have a negative impact if an organization does not invest in disruptive technologies. Perhaps this very concept can seem counterintuitive, but the idea is simple. Kodak was a successful company that was the incumbent organization in the digital camera revolution. It had most of the filmmaking market share and fine-tuned its processes to be efficient. Kodak’s management team was an example of “Christensen’s theory of disruptive technologies (Lucas, 2009). This theory suggests that managers do not invest in disruptive technologi...
Read more